Page 116 - Bus101FlipBook
P. 116

6-34                   Ethics & Social Responsibility                            [CH 6



                                             In the end, the only way the firm could prevent the takeover was to buy back the
                                          stock held by Steinberg's firm, Reliance Financial Services Group. In exchange for his
                                          $32 million profit and $28  million to cover his  out-of-pocket expenses, Steinberg
                                          pledged  not to buy  Disney stock  for the  next ten years.  Many Disney  shareholders
                                          were enraged  that they could not sell their shares for the premium price paid to
                                          Steinberg and that the firm's market price actually dropped after the payoff was made
                                          public.
                                             As a result of cases such as this, companies now erect elaborate financial and legal
                                          barriers to greenmail.

                                          Executive Compensation
                                             As workers get promoted to higher positions, their pay level also increases. It is no
                                          longer shocking to see top executives earning more than $1 million a year in salary
                                          along with  special stock options and other perks that can bring them much higher
                                          compensation. Chrysler's Lee Iacocca, for instance, started at Chrysler on a $1 annual
                                          salary, plus stock options. Prior to leaving he had a base exceeding $2 million, and
                                          accumulated enough stock options to reap more than $15 million in a year.

                                             Chief executives of large firms carry a heavy responsibility and  should be
                                          compensated for what they do. However, when executive pay packages have exceeded
                                          $100 million per year, such as with Jack Welch (former CEO of General Electric) and
                                          Michael Eisner (CEO of Disney), or a Ken Lay (Enron), coupled with stock options
                                          and additional compensations, some see these as acts of financial overreach. CEO’s in
                                          medium and small sized firms have salary ratios that are about 15:1 to the average
                                          wages of the workers.
                                             The apparent  randomness of executive earnings adds  to the confusion about
                                          executive salaries. A special Fortune magazine study found that a number of factors
                                          influence executive compensation. Company size, performance, and risk, as well as
                                          the level of government regulation, job tenure, and location (executives in New York
                                          City and Los Angeles average 7 to 10 percent more than executives elsewhere in the
                                          country) can make a difference in salary. Still, according to Fortune's study, statistical

                                          analysis could rationalize only 39 percent of the variance in executive salaries.
                                             CEO and executive pay are based on any number of elements, the principles being:
                                                  Company executive pay across the industry.
                                                  Performance goals as a measure of progress.
                                                  Linking pay to return to shareholders.

                                             In 1980 the executive pay was 42 times that of the average worker pay, a ratio of
                                          42:1, and in 2018 executives of top 350 companies were receiving 278 times the pay
                                          as the average worker’s pay, a ratio of  278:1. On average, in  2018, these top
                                          executives  received $17.2 million in  pay.  Employees working in those industries—
                                          ranging from retail to technology and manufacturing—typically earned $64,500. As a
                                          note for comparison some professional athletes in their entertainment roll on the court
                                          or field are compensated on a ratio of 384:1, which is significantly more than their fans
                                          and ticket holders earn, and much more that your teachers.
                                             Logically, the better a company performs, the more its executives make; and some
                                          executives will do well even if the company loses money. Many people think such
                                          scenarios should  be eliminated  because they endanger the earnings  of  shareholders,
                    Thou shalt not covet thy
                    neighbour's house, thou   who are the actual owners of the company.
                    shalt not covet thy       Left-leaning economists, politicians, and other commentators frequently use the
                    neighbour's wife, nor his   CEO-to-worker pay ratio as an example of why capitalism is inherently flawed and
                    manservant, nor his   their arguments are always enriched with biased comments of “the rich getting richer
                    maidservant, nor his ox,   and the poor getting poorer.” Yet, economic research indicates that when the Federal
                    nor his ass, nor any   Reserve, at the direction  of Congress,  prints more currency, increasing the money
                    thing that is thy     supply which inflates the dollar causing its purchasing power to decline, the value of
                    neighbour's.          stocks to rise. Many executives are paid in dollars and stock options. The options are
                           —Exodus 20:17   set at a price, and  when the Federal Reserve inflates the money supply then the
                                          executive who is also compensated with stock receives the benefit of those increased
                                          share values. It is the common worker, who is only paid an hourly or salaried wage



                   Copyrighted Material
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121