Page 115 - Bus101FlipBook
P. 115

CH 6]                                 Business 101                                    6-33



            companies, with no operations, inventory or revenue. The end result is that the investor
            has  contributed  their  hard-earned dollars  into worthless holdings. Are those people
            offering those stocks being socially responsible or ethical?
                When mismanagement causes investors to lose large sums of money, the results
            can be disastrous, especially for the small investor who has placed his life savings on
            the advice of a trusted financial adviser.

            Insider Trading
               Financial managers have the ability to investigate their investments thoroughly and
            to present all facts and potential risks to investors. They have a responsibility to make
            financial information available to all so that everyone is operating with the same
            information. Insider trading occurs when individuals buy and sell stock on the basis of
            their position in a firm or agency, which gives them access to information that is not
            available to the general public. Such information, known only to the few, the insiders,
            gives them an unfair advantage over typical investors.
               “Isn't everybody doing it?” was the question from Wall Street as reported in one
            newsmagazine after Dennis Levine's debacle led to the Ivan Boesky case and a rash of
            SEC subpoenas.  In  one sense, everybody on  Wall Street  does trade on inside
            information as few people outside the brokerage community are aware of the rumors
            and other information traders regularly rely on to make decisions. However, most of
            this is accessible to those who want to find it; the inside trades that Levine, Boesky,
            and others made  were  based  on information  not generally available even on the
            “Street” (business jargon for the securities industries).
               Laws exist that prohibit insider trading, and the SEC prosecutes individuals found
            violating them. Some go to jail,  pay heavy fines, and  all have their  lives ruined.
            Boesky  accumulated  a fortune of $250  million,  and was  fined $100 million  and
            sentenced to three years in prison. Ken Lay, Jeffrey Skillng, Andrew Fastow knew that
            Enron’s growth was based on false reporting and in the beginning of the investigations
            sold off their stocks to profit from their misdeeds, each received prison terms and one
            died prior to sentencing.
               Whether these punishments will prevent future insider excesses depends less on the
            threat of the SEC than on how badly members of certain financial communities want
            money, as millions of dollars—and hundreds of millions of dollars—can be made in                    6
            today's active stock market.
               Of course, a most notable incident revolves around Martha Stewart. Many think
            and parrot that Martha Stewart was convicted on insider trading, and was sentenced to
            federal prison on this charge. However, that is false, as Martha was convicted on lying
            to a federal investigator and NOT insider trading. Which is worse? The penalty was the
            same and very expensive!

               Greenmail refers to a  situation in which  wealthy investors  buy a  significant
            portion of a cash-rich but minimally profitable (or unprofitable) firm. They then hint to
            the firm's board of directors that they are going to attempt a takeover and oust current
            management. In many instances, the board offers to buy the greenmailer’s stock at a
            price significantly above its current market value to preserve their personal power,
            positions, and income.
               Saul R. Steinberg began accumulating Disney stock through various avenues and
            after he accumulated 11 percent began threatening a hostile takeover of Walt Disney
            Productions. Disney’s theme parks and film productions were not as profitable as they
            had been in the past, and investors were disgruntled with their returns, causing them to
            look disfavorably at the board of directors.
               Disney's board took a number of steps to ward off Steinberg's attack. It issued a
            new stock  offering worth more than $537 million and  purchased another company,
            Arvida, a resort and home community developer. These moves were intended to dilute
            the relative value of Steinberg's holdings. However, these defensive moves produced a
            weakened financial position for Disney that penalized all its stockholders. Company
            debt more than doubled. The market value of Disney stock dropped by 22 percent in
            two days. Stock value declined more than $500 million during the takeover attempt.


                 Readers are Leaders, Leaders are Readers, non-readers follow!
                                                                                      Copyrighted Material
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120