Page 31 - Bus101FlipBook
P. 31

CH 1]                                 Business 101                                   1-19




                                                                                                              1

























            ownership with heavy  intrusive  regulations on  private  ownership. Advocates of
            private enterprise often classify mixed economies as socialist if there is a high degree
            of public ownership. However, such countries still have far more private ownership
            than is found in socialist nations.
               The proportions of private and public enterprise vary widely in mixed economies.
            The mixes are also changing. In France, many government entities are now operated
            as private enterprises.  This trend toward converting  government enterprises into

            privately held companies is referred to as privatization.

            A Comparative Note
               Private enterprise has proved to be the most effective economic system for any
            economy. It has provided a high degree of economic freedom, a low cost of living,
            substantial product choice, high earnings, provided for considerable public welfare,
            and many other economic benefits. The United States became a world power because
            of the private enterprise system and the businesses that operate within its framework.
               Major  U.S. corporations are among the  world's leading  firms. Industry in the
            United  States is extremely diversified. Thousands  of business enterprises exist in
            nearly every conceivable commercial activity.
               Other economic systems aspire to the high levels achieved by the U.S. business
            system. Those countries who function with low productivity restrict private property
            and enterprises through their laws and regulations.
               The principals of business are the same for the individual and household as
               they are for John Deere, General Mills, or General Motors. The difference is
               the size of the checkbook and financial resources.
               Comparing our poor with the world’s poor and they don’t look so poor. Imagine
            our  poor: they have an automobile, two  televisions, radios, and indoor toilets, a
            personal cell phone, with an income of $26,200 per year for a family of four. The
            world’s poor cannot claim that condition with nearly half of the world’s population
            (apx. 3.5 billion people) living on $2.50 per day, which is  $912.50 per person. Table
            1.3 represents a sample of a few standards of living conditions in five countries.

            CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
               As you continue through your course and this book, it will become apparent that
            we are all touched and influenced by business. Nobody works for free, not even those
            running large  “Non-profits” because they  are relying  on  an Internal Revenue Tax
            regulation for  their  designation.  Non-profits have to have income to pay for their
            employees (no one works for free), to pay their rent, electric, gas, water and trash bills
            when they come due. If they cannot, then they shut their doors. You are the same.



                                                                               Copyrighted Material
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36