Page 67 - Bus101FlipBook
P. 67

CH 5]                                 Business 101                                     5-9




                   that the seller now refuses to complete the contracted transaction. Damages
                   would not be an adequate remedy.
                  You, a mortgagor, set out on your horse to pay the mortgage on your farm.
                   Your horse stumbles, breaking its leg. This mishap delays you by one day in
                   getting to the appointed time and place to pay your mortgage. The mortgage
                   holder can foreclose on your farm, and at law, you have no remedy.
                                                                                     Mortgagor: one who owes
                   Your neighbor begins in the tanning business. His tanning factory emits great   money. The borrower in a
                   quantities of smoke, soot, and malicious odors in the direction of your home,   mortgage, typically a
                   causing you great personal harm. Your only remedy would be to periodically   homeowner or other
                   sue for money damages.                                            property owner.

                 Of course, if you could somehow reach the King to plead your case, he could give   Mortgagee: one who is
            you adequate and appropriate relief given the circumstances; remember the King’s feudal   owed money.  The
            position. The King could order that the farm seller do what he had contracted (promised)   mortgage holder. The
            to do, or specifically perform on the contract to sell and give you the deed to farm. Or in   lender in a mortgage,
            light of the circumstances of  your injured horse, the King could permit you to  redeem   typically the bank.
            your lost farm from the  mortgage holder. The King could  enjoin (order to stop) your
            neighbor from continuing his nuisance, and that his tanning factory be relocated elsewhere
            where it would not be a nuisance.                                        dispensation of equity:
                These remedies illustrate royal prerogative, and duty. It was understood that the King   delivering what is right to
            represented a link between divine authority  and  man and that the King owed it to his   the owner who holds equity;
            subjects that rightness prevail without respect to person. However, the demands of royal   equity refers to ownership.
            duty left little time for royal dispensations of equity. The King eventually delegated this
            element of royal function to his “chancellor,” a highly educated high churchman (generally
            a church bishop), who would possess the moral fiber to see that the right thing was always
            done (equity). It would be inappropriate to entrust “the conscience of the King” to a mere
            common law judge, as we do today; they  could easily be corrupted,  making case law               5
            where the rule of stare decisis (to stand by already decided cases) would be applied or
            misapplied.
                The enormity of cases overwhelming the King’s Chancellor caused him to establish a
            system of courts of equity, delegating the chancellor’s authority to other high churchmen.
            This produced a divided court system of law courts and equity courts. The purpose of the
            equity court was to remedy the inadequacy of a legal remedy. The United States originally
            had a divided English court system, however in almost every state one court gives both
            legal and equitable relief.                                              Redeemed: purchased
                Equitable remedies of course have become formalized and the three most important   from bondage and set free.
                                                                                     Property that is has been
            are:                                                                     returned to the who bonded
                  1. Specific performance: Compelling the parties to a contract to perform per the   it, (set it up to be forfeited
                     terms of the contract as distinguished from awarding damages for its   for non payment). The
                     nonperformance which is a legal remedy.                         property, think of the pink
                  2.  Relief from forfeiture:  Disallowing strict enforcement of a  contract where it   slip, evidence of a loan and
                                                                                     possession, on you car that
                     would produce a  forfeiture of property. This would prevent the mortgage   you hold and the title that
                     holder from foreclosing, taking the property from the mortgagor, and allow the   the finance company holds.
                     mortgagor to redeem his property when the late payment of the mortgage was   When the lender is paid,
                     caused by circumstances beyond his control. This eventually became known as   the finance signs your pink
                     the equity of redemption.                                       slip as the debt being paid,
                                                                                     is reported to the state
                  3. Injunction: Ordering a person to do or to cease and desist from doing some   office of records and you
                     thing.                                                          receive a Title document
                                                                                     which is evidence that the
                The qualifications for equity relief also developed. That is, the one seeking equity   property has been
            must also be doing equity. Equity has this doctrine of “clean hands,” which is to say that   redeemed from bondage
            the one seeking equity must not themselves be guilty of fraud or other unconscionable   and the incurred debt has
                                                                                     been paid.
            conduct in relation to the relief sought.
                Equity requires that all parties be fair to each other and thus one  must also act
            diligently to assert their rights. Here is where the maxim that “equity aids the vigilant, not
            those who slumber on their  rights.”  Laches, an unreasonable delay, will bar a suit in   Laches
            equity, as the statute of limitations bars a suit at law. If one party is to rescind a contract,   an unreasonable delay.
            that party must act promptly to do so upon discovering their rights, for even a short delay
            may be fatal.



                 Learning to Do, Doing to Learn, Earning to Live, Living to Serve   Copyrighted Material
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72